When it comes to website development sometimes digital businesses have a tendency to define success as “go-live” and it’s easy to see why…
Finite internal resources and an exhaustive list of mission-critical projects compete around-the-clock while external pressure mounts to provide Markets with news of positive results and appease shareholders with favourable dividends.
It is relatively easy to see when an organisations’ goal state is to just “ship”. The sentiment permeates into website performance and it becomes evident in the web analytics data as funnel drop-off reports confirm a “leaky bucket”. The tangible post-launch disappoint is testament to the fact that website content is rarely perfect the first time around.
Fortunately, there are many ways to mitigate the risk of visitor abandonment and one of the best results-driven approaches utilised on Client websites in the past is Landing Page Optimisation (LPO). Embracing the theory of continual improvement, LPO takes a longer term approach to success than just “go-live” and targets key website pages for enhancement.
Recently, I had the pleasure of being invited to attend a LPO webinar organised by Paras Chopra who is the brainchild behind Visual Web Optimiser – an A/B Testing product that is creating quite a stir in the market place. With complimentary speakers from Gazehawk and ConversionVoodoo this session provided a great introduction to inspire any business to move past the release goal line and into a state of perpetual optimisation.
Here are some of the golden nuggets that were shared for Landing Page Optimisation:
If that has stirred your curiousity, you can watch the webinar in all its full glory here
And remember, don’t just ship – Optimise!
I have recently moved house to a new area of London, and my Mum is soon coming to visit. Being new to the area, I don’t really know the standard and prices of the hotels; however, my girlfriend (Jassmine) and her mum (Vonnie) have lived around this part of London for over twenty years. Vonnie, therefore, seemed the perfect person to ask what The Fox and Goose Hotel in Ealing was like. Her response, however, left me flabbergasted:
“I’ve heard of it, but let me check on TripAdvisor and get back to you.”
Now, I have worked with TripAdvisor in various capacities over the last three years (mainly buying space for display campaigns for clients such as Holland America Line or Tourism New Zealand) but never have I used it for personal reference, nor particularly come into contact with many people that have. So, this really threw me.
It used to be that I would watch my Dad idly typing words such as “hotels in Norwich” into the URL bar and see him become increasingly frustrated that the browser would return ‘this URL is not recognised or is incorrect.’ I would then grow irritable with him whilst I tried to explain that the Google search bar only required a vague idea of what he was looking for rather than him typing the full URL in the search box.
Over the weekend I spoke to my friends about their Internet habits and it turned out that we all have similar behaviours. We have up to five sites that we check every day, typically: Facebook, Twitter, a news site, a hobby site and something related to our profession (mine is NMA). Also, if we are looking to purchase an item we go directly to the site using the URL bar, typing in the full address. Google usage is fairly limited and often used simply to search for images or to answer that inane question which has come up in conversation and undoubtedly leads to the phrase: “let me Google it and you will see I’m right!”
However, those I know from the older generation seem to be developing a much broader experience of the internet. They seek information, find the deals, scratch further beneath the surface. They are no longer downloading the Pizza Express 2 for 1 offer from www.pizzaexpress.com, but printing off the buy six pizzas and pay nothing deal on www.obscurewebsite.com , found whilst routing around page four of the Google search results. (Personally, I haven’t scrolled below the fifth result on the list for at least three years.)
Maybe it’s because they have more time, maybe they are less frivolous with money (they have seen two recessions and survived both after all). Maybe it’s just those of us who have been Googling consistently for the last fifteen years have become lazy, and the over fifties have caught us up and learnt from our mistakes. As they say, slow and steady wins the race!
Either way I know that tonight I spent £5 pounds on a vegetable moussaka from Tesco’s and that my Mum and her friend are sharing two pizzas and a bottle of wine for £2.50 per head. I also know that Vonnie will continue to know more about hotels in Ealing than me.
As far as Brands are concerned this demographic needs to be taken seriously. Flashy display images that catch the attention of twenty-somethings may not work for those over fifty. They need some depth to the claims of cheap car insurance. Now, they will continue to look around and find out that the insurance might be cheap but the service is poor compared to the expensive insurer who looks after all your needs.
With speculative news this week that Google is to launch a new paid-for ‘enterprise’ level analytics solution, it got me thinking again about how this proposition might rate against the competition….
Would it be like an Urchin-Google Analytics love-child with the best bits from each gene pool and could Google finally provide a better support platform for the product (a major gripe from the ‘free’ user base).
The launch of Google Analytics in late 2005, gave many people access to the new world of web analytics for the first time and came with the added bonus of tracking integration with Search. Although, the new paint job on Urchin’s user interface was appreciated, the need to have (hosted) data storage at Google didn’t sit comfortably with everyone – namely, Germany and other small financial institutions. The subsequent re-launch of Urchin addressed privacy concerns by enabling on-site data collection and provided additional product features not found in Google Analytics like historical data reprocessing.
The debate amongst the legacy players about what constitutes ‘enterprise’ in the web analytics industry shows no signs of abating and suggests a degree of complacency has crept into the mix. The fact remains that the introduction of a ‘free’ analytics offering into the web analytics market has substantially increased its size and is not dissimilar to way a DVD format transformed a dwindling the home entertainment [video] market.
Perhaps, mergers and acquisitions have taken priority over product innovation in recent months and there is latent appetite in the market for the introduction of a robust paid-for enterprise level solution. Whether or not the Google offering is able to stand toe-to-toe with the existing ‘enterprise’ players is yet to be seen but, provided there is sufficient support infrastructure in place it is certain to make a splash.